Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Lucie Nguyen Tan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 01:23 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Vrancken Peeters vs L. Nguyen Tan

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 0 Tan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anouck Vrancken Peeters winning 2 and Lucie Nguyen Tan winning 0. The last match between Anouck Vrancken Peeters and Lucie Nguyen Tan was at the W35 Villeneuve d'Ascq, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peeters | 1 |
| Tan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Villeneuve d'Ascq(10-29-25)
A. V. Peeters vs L. N. Tan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.17% (139-92) | Career Total W/L | 48.94% (138-144) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. V. Peeters vs L. N. Tan Match Preview:
- In recent form, Anouck Vrancken Peeters has an edge with second serve performance, winning 40.39% of points compared to Lucie Nguyen Tan's 37.48%. Does this suggest a significant advantage? Possibly, considering the strong correlation with match success.
- For return games, both players are quite similar; Anouck Vrancken Peeters wins 51.72% of opponent's second serve points, slightly edging Lucie Nguyen Tan's 51.59%. Who holds the advantage? It's marginal, indicating closely matched skills in this area.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Anouck leads with 36.32% over Lucie's 34.50%, giving her a small advantage in breaking points.
- Analyzing breakpoints saved, Anouck displays greater resilience under pressure, saving 50.33% compared to Lucie's 43.75%. Could this be a critical factor? Indeed, it suggests Anouck's capability to withstand crucial match points.
- Overall performance favors Anouck, who boasts a 68.35% win rate over the past year versus Lucie's 46.67%. Is this disparity significant? Yes, indicating a more consistent track record.
- Surface preference could play a role; Anouck excels on indoor hard courts with a 78% win rate, whereas Lucie is most effective on clay, also with 78%. What does this mean for their upcoming match? Surface type might influence dynamics if the match is on an indoor hard court.
- In tournament levels, Anouck competes more frequently in higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 62.50%, compared to Lucie's 47.06% at Futures/Satellites events. How does this reflect on their relative experience? Anouck likely has faced tougher competition, honing her skills further.
- Regarding opponent quality, Lucie has faced slightly higher-ranked players, averaging at 357.47 compared to Anouck's 422.43. Could this experience shift the balance? It might, but Anouck's performance against lower-ranked but competitive players suggests adaptability.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Anouck excels with a 70% success rate in such scenarios, starkly contrasting with Lucie's 13%. Does this decisively favor Anouck? Yes, particularly in tightly contested matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the comparative statistics, several key areas highlight Anouck Vrancken Peeters as a formidable opponent. Her superior second serve performance and resilience in saving breakpoints suggest a stronger baseline game than Lucie Nguyen Tan.
Despite Lucie facing slightly higher-ranked opponents overall, Anouck has consistently excelled in matches, adding depth and experience to her profile. Particularly on indoor hard courts, Anouck's prowess gives her a noticeable edge.
Furthermore, in pressure situations where deciding sets come into play, Anouck's impressive success rate solidifies her position as a likely winner.
Given these factors and current form statistics, Anouck Vrancken Peeters is favored to win the upcoming match against Lucie Nguyen Tan.
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Lucie Nguyen Tan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. V. Peeters vs L. N. Tan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:3:59 | Average Match Time | 1:3:59 |
| 70% (30/43) | 1st Serve % | 53% (24/45) |
| 73% (22/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 100% (5/5) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 56% (25/45) | Return Points Win % | 33% (14/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. V. Peeters Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | ||
F | W | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
L. N. Tan Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 7-6(2) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||

A. V. Peeters vs L. N. Tan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.17% (139/92) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.94% (138/144) |
| 57.84% (310/226) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.60% (311/316) |
| 53.97% (2647/2258) | Games Win/Loss | 50.23% (2874/2848) |
| 60.27% (44/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.94% (23/26) |
| 53.21% (58/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.97% (98/87) |
| 77.08% (37/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35.42% (17/31) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 158 | Aces Total | 277 |
| 0.44 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1063 | Total Double Faults | 847 |
| 1:39:54 | Average Match Time | 1:24:31 |
| 424.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 494.53 |
| 63% (8917/14125) | 1st Serve % | 63% (10304/16339) |
| 59% (5296/8917) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (5979/10304) |
| 44% (2282/5208) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2613/6035) |
| 51% (979/1913) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1029/2081) |
| 49% (6787/13961) | Return Points Win % | 47% (7452/15849) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.70% (55/42) | Challenger W/L | 42.37% (75/102) |
| 63.16% (84/49) | Futures W/L | 60.58% (63/41) |
| 60% (138/229) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (138/282) |
| 45% (18/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (19/53) |
| 57% (43/76) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (28/63) |
| 88% (126/111) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (138/119) |
| 12% (126/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (138/19) |
| 26% (105/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (144/19) |
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
